Smith sued Ariens for injuries sustained while operating a snowmobile in a field. The snowmobile hit a rock that was partially covered by snow. On impact, the right side of Smith’s face came down and hit a brake bracket on the left side of the snowmobile. The brake bracket had two sharp metal protrusions on the inside that were toward the plaintiff’s face. What theory of recovery best supports the plaintiff’s case? Explain. Should the plaintiff be awarded damages? Why?