Smith sued Ariens for injuries sustained while operating a snowmobile in a field. The snow mobile hit a rock that was partially covered by snow. On impact, the right side of Smiths face came down and hit a brake bracket on the left side of the snowmobile. The brake bracket had two sharp metal protrusions on the inside that were toward the plaintiff's face. What theory of recovery best supports the plaintiff's case? Explain. Should the plaintiff be awarded damages? Why?