You are conducting a research on the socio-economic backgrounds/characteristics of people joining revolutionary guerrilla organizations. And in your analysis you find that an overwhelming percentage of them (about 90%) consist of people who are uneducated, poor, not very employable and economically not mobile either. However the remaining 10% of the members seem to be the polar opposite: extremely well educated, having held prestigious, high-paying jobs and vertically very mobile individuals (before joining the organization). Should you ignore these latter simply as anomalies/outliers and concentrate on the 90% as the definitive pattern to draw inferences from? Explain your answer.