Problem
In footnote 1 of Star Athletica, the majority clarifies that it is not ruling on whether the separable graphic elements of the cheerleader uniforms are sufficiently original to qualify for protection. Do you believe plaintiff's separable pictorial, graphic, and sculptural features meet the originality requirement, stated in Feist? Should there be a higher standard of originality for separable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features on useful articles than the Feist standard?