Should the U.S. Senate ratify the Koyto Treaty and agree to quantified legally-binding objectives for greenhouse gas emission limitations and significant overall reductions within specified time frames? In your 500 word essay, discuss
What are the economic ramifications of a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions mandate? Is it possible to switch over to "clean" technologies while still using fossil fuels?
Is it the ethical responsibility of American to agree to the Kyoto protocol and limit Greenhouse Gas emissions? Why do you believe our government has previously withdrawn from the agreement?
If the question of man's impact on global warming is still debated, it is not the wiser decision to try and make changes in the event that humanity's carbon footprint is actually causing environmental damage? What would be the argument to continue on without making changes?