Question 1: Should the definition of "high crime area" be determined by a law enforcement officer? What arguments can be made in favor of this method of defining a "high crime area?" What arguments can be made against this method of defining a "high crime area?"
Question 2: What if the Supreme Court decided that race and ethnicity could never be used as a part of determining reasonable suspicion? Would that make the job of law enforcement more difficult? How might law enforcement officers do their job differently if this were the case? Explain your answers.