Rs 75 paid for repairs to furniture had been entered in the


The trial offset of M. Mukherjee did not count on 31.3.2011. The accompanying blunders were recognized thereafter. Pass the vital diary passages to amend the mistakes and figure out the distinction in trial equalization expecting that the sum total of what slips have been corrected.

(i) An aggregate of Rs. 600 got from Mathur on 31.3.2011 was entered in the money book on 2.4.2011.

(ii) Returns inwards book was undercast by Rs. 300.

(iii) The buy of for Rs. 25,000 was entered in the buys day book.

(iv) Wages of laborers occupied with the development of building producing Rs. 35,000 were charged to compensation account.

(v) A buy of Rs. 2,671 had been presented on the charge of supplier's record as Rs. 2,617.

(vi) Goods adding up to Rs. 1,000 had been returned by Raju and were taken into stock, however no passage was gone in the books for the exchange. 

(vii) Rs. 24,000 paid for buy of T.V. for proprietors own utilization had been charged to incidental cost account. 

(viii) An offer of Rs. 600 to Sethi was acknowledged to his record for Rs. 60. 

(ix) An offer of Rs. 2,000 has been gone through the buys diary. 

(x) Rs. 75 paid for repairs to furniture had been entered in the aggregate segment of negligible money book, yet not entered in the suitable investigation section, the aggregate of which has been posted.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Finance Basics: Rs 75 paid for repairs to furniture had been entered in the
Reference No:- TGS01199500

Expected delivery within 24 Hours