Ron contracts to repair Stu's building for $30,000. Payment is to be made "on the satisfaction of Tina, Stu's architect." Stu tells Tina not to approve the repairs. Ron sues Stu for $30,000. Ron likely will win, because Stu is not acting reasonably and in good faith. Win, because Tina is Stu's architect. Lose, because Ron is not acting reasonably, honestly, and in good faith. Lose, because Tina has not expressed satisfaction with the work.