Select a topic on which your persuasive writing paper will be focused.
Write a one to two (1-2) page research proposal in which you:
•Identify the topic you selected and explain two (2) reasons for using it.
•Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.
•Describe three (3) major characteristics of your audience (official position, decision-making power, current view on topic, other important characteristic).
•Describe the paper's scope and outline the major sections.
•Identify and explain the questions to be answered.
•Explain your research plan, including the methods of researching and organizing research.
•Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
•Document at least three (3) primary sources and three (3) secondary sources. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University's Resource Center.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
•Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
•Write a research proposal that states the claim and scope of the research project.
•Outline the main sections of the research project.
•Devise an ordered research plan to obtain appropriate resources.
•Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.
•Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.
yes this is Iwas write
I select a topic should Affirmative Action Laws be changed? The topic that I have selected for my research paper is if the affirmative action laws should be changed. There are two reasons that I have used this topic. Firstly, the topic is of special importance both in academic as well as business and government spheres. Secondly, the law is giving rise to heated debate for its being against the intended purpose in reality and has attracted lots of criticism from different corners. Generally, affirmative action is referred to as the process by which a business agency or a government agency grants special employment and advancement rights to ethnic minorities. The country has had a history of racial discrimination and the affirmative action laws in a way try to compensate for it by giving some minority applicants the extra support through some special provisions. However, frequently a question arises that if the affirmative action laws serve the intended purpose. The affirmative action laws are an attempt at elimination of discrimination as well as at the redressal of past effects of discrimination. But, sometimes affirmative action is also likened to segregation laws. The validity of the affirmative action laws has also been questioned several times. These issues, debates and arguments indicate that in the near future it could be necessary to abolish the affirmative action laws. In my research paper I will mainly shed light on the issues that have been born of affirmative action laws as well as try to establish if in light of these issues, there is a need to change the law. Affirmative action laws have been a point of contradiction due to several issues that have come to light during the recent years. The Affirmative action programs are governed by several overlapping laws, of which a common principle is that Loading...affirmative action programs should be encouraged to redress the effects of discrimination that has happened in past. In case of the American employment law, affirmative action has been evolving and reached here through a series of government proclamations as well as court decrees. The private employers who do not receive any public funding re not bound to adopt the affirmative action policies. But, in case of the Federal contractors or the subcontractors, they have to take affirmative action for the recruitment of qualified minorities, women, persons with disabilities etc. The affirmative action programs mostly come under question in case of the educational system. In case of education, the most often highlighted case is that of mismatch. Scholars have also raised the question that if the affirmative action programs are benefiting or harming the beneficiaries. However, it had been suggested as early as the 1960s that these laws could also prove harmful for the intended beneficiaries. Some cases related to negative effect of affirmative action laws on the beneficiaries have been brought to light by the scholars. The beneficiaries after getting their admission into the elite institutions are not able to keep pace or bear the academic pressure, which often results in falling CGPAs and poor career graph. This phenomenon is often referred to as mismatch. My research paper will aim to answer mainly the following questions: Are affirmative action laws serving the intended purpose? Are the beneficiaries being benefited? What are the negative effects of these laws and how the beneficiaries instead of being benefited may be being harmed especially in case of education? My paper will discuss the reasons for changing the laws as well as shed light on the situations where these laws are giving birth to trouble. The laws are frequently being a Loading...bone of contention and the number of court cases related to the affirmative action laws has also been rising. The paper will discuss all these points including the things which put a question mark on the validity of these laws. At last the paper will also address the question that if there is really a need for affirmative action laws. For research I will accumulate information from primary as well as secondary resources. Primary data can be collected by interviewing employers who recruit under the affirmative action laws as well as other resources like beneficiary students or college officials. There has been too much debate on this topic and there are several cases where media has highlighted the questionability of the law. At this point the most important requirement is to discuss whether there is really a need for formative action laws. We have come across situations which indicate towards a need for changing these laws. The problem of mismatch is also frequently being highlighted. In the light of all these issues and situations it is really crucial to discuss the validity of the affirmative action laws and programs. Loading...
THIS YOUR ANSWER BUT NO REFRANCE PLEASE SEND ME JUST REFRANCE ONLY
Title here
In 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, eliminating preference in education and employment based on race, sex, religion, as well as other phenotypic characteristics that do not adequately evaluate the nature of an individual. Affirmative Action is a set of policies generally used to promote the diversity of a particular race or characteristic. Affirmative action may also be thought of as an ability to help individuals who have faced inadequate treatment in the past. Although affirmative action is a good idea in theory, affirmative action promotes discrimination and violate the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as many other important Supreme Court cases.
A very important Supreme Court case, Bakke. v. University of California Board of Regents (1978), determined the use of quotas in education unconstitutional. In 2003, Gratz v. Bollinger, found that point systems used at the University of Michigan were in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as well as the Equal Protection Clause (14th Amendment). A twist of events unfolded in 2003 court case, Grutter v. Bollinger, where preference based on race was ruled constitutional in that a diverse student body promotes educational benefits.
Since the creation of affirmative action and its unregulated use in education, we have seen a birth in unhealthy competition in which groups are looking for preference based on arbitrary characteristics such as race, gender, and religion. Affirmative action favors characteristics that have no bearing on the true success of the individual where contribution to society is unhealthily measured by skin pigment or the religion in which you affiliate. Finally, affirmative action does not provide an adequate process in promoting diversity - instead of moving forward, the use focuses on past injustice instead of looking at equality where people are differentiated based on their skills and passion and not the color of their skin. Affirmative action should promote the idea that humans are all equal, but may be differentiated by their achievements or merits.
It has been noted by many individuals that Affirmative action is a form of reverse discrimination. One individual, Justice Powell, commented on the court case, Bakke. v. University of California Board of Regents, he added, "Preferring members of any one group for no reason other than race or ethnic origin is discrimination for its own sake." Linda Chavez, president of the Center for Equal Opportunity asserts, "Racial preferences produce a diversity of skin colors but a division of sentiments. They put people of many different races together in a way that makes each racial group see the other racial groups as competitors for some arbitrary advantage." In both of these scenarios we see that affirmative action promotes discrimination by offering a false sense of diversity where people are differentiated based on random characteristics. Racial discrimination can be seen at Howard University where 86% of the students are African American and less than 2% are Caucasian. Affirmative action was originally meant to rectify past abuse to certain groups, the policy is archaic and no longer applies since it is almost impossible to trace the ancestry to past abuse. Even if the ancestry could be traced, the actual beneficiaries are not the individuals who are alive today.
Another form of abuse caused by affirmative action is the lowering of academic performance among minority students as well as labor market inefficiencies. In one study conducted by Michigan State University, Professors Harry Holzer and David Neumark found a correlation between affirmative action and the likelihood of lower educational attainment. They also found that many minorities fell short of the educational requirements on jobs they were hired into. Another point to make is that many minority students who are given preference at Universities may not perform as well as they could if they were being evaluated solely on academic performance. For instance, if an individual only needs a 3.2 GPA to get into Harvard University, why would the individual strive for a 4.0? Affirmative action in this sense promotes a type of degraded academic performance where evaluation is not based on how you measure academically to your peers.
In summary it is important to note that affirmative action may seem plausible, but destructive when given a closer look. Affirmative action promotes discrimination in a reverse manner where minorities are promoted based on their race or gender. This form of evaluation decreases competition based on performance and academic merit and also furthers the stigma of racism rather than noting all individuals as equal with differentiation based on achievements and performance. We also see that affirmative action oversteps many boundaries of the Civil Rights act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14 Amendment.
The solution to the problem is to promote the best possible primary and secondary education for minority students and eliminate the preference based on race, gender, and religion. This will provide a level playing field in which all individuals have an equal opportunity where passion, commitment, performance, and determination are the only factors being considered when finding the qualified individual. This will promote a healthy form of competition fostering academics and achievement while maintaining that all individuals are equal.