Question 1. Nagel argues that the atomic bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were just like what other kind of action, just on a larger scale?
- Killing the wife and child of someone attacking you in order to distract him from his attack.
- Bombing a munitions factory and killing some of the civilian workers inside.
- Firing at an enemy soldier and hitting an innocent bystander with a stray bullet.
- Bombing a convoy of enemy soldiers.
Question 2. According to Kant, persons:
- are rational beings.
- must always be regarded as an end.
- have absolute value.
- all of the above.
Question 3. Which one of these is not a way of expressing Kant's Categorical Imperative?
- Act as if the maxim of your action were to become by your will a universal law.
- Act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.
- Act so that the maxim of your action ensures the satisfaction of your desires.
- None of the above.
Question 4. Kant explains that respect for a person is:
- the recognition of the worth of the person's potential contribution to society.
- dependent upon whether the person respects others.
- both A and B
- none of the above.
Question 5. In the video "What is Just War Theory?" Michael Walzer states that a core idea of Just War Theory
- requires us to imagine the rules of war as they would apply to a peaceful, civil society
- requires us to judge the conduct of a war independently of the character of the war
- requires us to imagine that a war is like a bank robbery, and that the just warrior defending his country has rights the unjust warrior invading his country does not have
- none of the above
Question 6. In the video, "Drones Are Ethical and Effective," Kenneth Anderson argues that the use of drones is ethical because @The answer can be found in the video "Drones Are Ethical and Effective"
- it provides a greater separation between the target and operator
- it allows us to maintain a list of high value targets
- it is more precise than other forms of weaponry
- none of the above
Question 7. Which would be an example of a hypothetical imperative, according to Kant's Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals:
- If I want to keep my customers, I should be honest with them.
- It would be nice if everyone respected each other.
- I ought never to make a promise that I don't intend to keep.
- all of the above.
Question 8. 8. In Kant Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, the maxim of an act is:
- the policy or principle that you would be following if you did it.
- the expected overall utility resulting from the action.
- the moral rule that an act either respects or violates .
- all of the above.
Question 9. Nagel's argument that hostility or aggression should be directed at its true object means that which of the following would probably not be permissible?
- Torturing a prisoner to get the names of his confederates.
- Attacking an enemy country's agricultural system.
- Bombing major cultural centers.
- All of the above.
Question 10. According to Thomas Nagel's article, "War and Massacre," the absolutist position that creates no problems of interpretation is
- rule utilitarianism
- act utilitarianism
- pacifism
- humanitarian intervention
Question 11. According to Nagel, to which of the following groups of people is hostility most appropriately aimed?
- Innocents
- Civilians
- Combatants
- Non-combatants
Question 12. In the article "War and Massacre," Thomas Nagel argues that moral absolutism
- is consistent with the principles of utilitarianism
- can be used to justify genocide
- is primarily concerned with what a person is doing
- is primarily concerned with the outcome of a person's actions
Question 13. Kant argues that when I find someone in need:
- I should give whatever spare resources I have unless it makes me worse off than the person I'm trying to help.
- I should consider a world in which no one helped me when I was in need, recognize that I could never will such a world, and help them in the best way that I can.
- I should sympathize with them, but recognize that the world is better off overall if we each only look after our own interests.
- I should remember that as autonomous beings they are responsible for their own situation, and thus that I have no responsibility to help them out.
Question 14. According to Nagel, which of the following may be permitted by absolutism, at least in some circumstances?
- Intentionally killing an innocent person
- Doing something that brings about an innocent person's death
- Dropping a nuclear bomb on an enemy city
- Torturing an innocent person
Question 15. Kant argues that we should never use people as a means:
- unless we are certain that it benefits the majority.
- unless we are certain that it is to their own long-term benefit.
- unless we are respecting their rational autonomy at the same time.
- for any purpose whatsoever.
Question 16. According to the video "Religion, War, and Violence," proponents of Just War Theory agree that without the restraints of Just War Theory
- the violence and aggression of war would be worse
- humanitarian intervention would be more successful
- prisoners and noncombatants would have greater equality
- none of the above
Question 17. Reason is a faculty that we have that:
- is only good if it succeeds in satisfying our desires.
- is the driving principle of a good will.
- is the fundamental ground of human dignity.
- both B and C
Question 18. Jeremy Waldron argues that the current use of drone warfare is unethical because
- it is conducted by unlawful combatants such as CIA personnel who are not subject to military ethics
- it is conducted by individuals who are thousands of miles removed from targets
- it may result in unintended civilian casualties
- all of the above
Question 19. According to the video "Religion, War, and Violence," Just War Theory asserts that military intervention
- can be seen as an act of altruism
- must always have an altruistic component
- must be primarily an act of altruism
- must never have an altruistic component
Question 20. Jeremy Waldron argues that drone warfare is neither ethical or effective because it
- threatens a world of death lists and death squads
- promotes the growth of terrorism
- inhibits the development of counter-terrorism strategies
- all of the above