Q:
1. What is the most "jealously" protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case?
2. What court decided the case in the assignment?
3. Explain - state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis.
4. According to the case, why was this not defamation, and what tort did the court support a filing for?
5. In the decision, why does the court state further proceedings may be required?
A. the name and citation of the case
B. the name of the court which decided the case
C. the year of the decision
D. the facts of the case
E. the issue of the case
F. the "decision" of the case
G. for what principle of law was the Esposito case used (cited for) in the case?