Problem: In Stephen J Wykstra's "The Humean Obstacle to Evidential Arguments From Suffering: On Avoiding the Evils of 'Appearance" Wykstra puts forth the idea of CORNEA which stands for the Condition Of Reasonable Epistemic Access which means you cannot make a "it does not appear" claim if there is no connection between the evidence and the claim.
Provide a well thought out argument in support of Wykstra's claim.