Provide a legal argument for why this is not a partnership


Facts:

Joe is a taxi driver. He reaches an agreement with Ann, who owns a taxi, on these terms:-

• At times to be agreed, Joe can pick up the taxi from Ann, who will deliver it with a tank full of fuel, in a clean condition and in proper repair.
• Joe can then drive the taxi for profit-making purposes for a maximum 12-hour shift, charging standard taxi rates, and using the radio system which Ann pays for at her own expense.
• During the shift, Joe will be entitled to buy petrol for the taxi out of the takings from the taxi fares.
• Joe must return the taxi to Ann no later than the 12-hour limit, in a clean condition and with the fuel tank full.
• The balance of Joe's takings (after fuel costs) will be shared between Joe and Ann 50/50.
• Ann will be responsible to pay for all other expenses of running the taxi, including taxi licence renewals, repairs and maintenance, insurances, etc.

Question 1: Provide a legal argument for why this is NOT a partnership under the Partnership Act 1891 (Qld).

Question 2: Apply the "three certainties" to demonstrate why this agreement does NOT create a trust.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Provide a legal argument for why this is not a partnership
Reference No:- TGS01051387

Expected delivery within 24 Hours