Plaintiff caruso was gambling at the foxwoods casino, which was owned by defendant mashantucket pequot gaming enterprise. when he went to use the restroom, carusoslipped and fell on the floor in an area that had just been mopped. to gain compensation for the imjuries he suffered from the fall, he sued the casino for negligence for failing to place warning signs or cones around the just mopped area. the casino argued that contributory negligence on the part of causo in failing to pay attention to his surroundings in light of the obviousness of the danger should bar him from recovering. how do you believe the court ruled in this case and why?