part -1make sure you read the output carefully


Part -1

Make sure you read the output carefully. This output pertains to a set of juvenile court data looking at the length of time that juvenile offenders are held in secure detention while their case is being processed through juvenile court. For this regression model, the following variables are used:

LOS: the length of stay in detention, in days

Number of filed charges: the number of different crimes they are currently charged with

Number of prior JD/JS cases: the number of prior juvenile court cases

Number of prior felonies: the number of prior charges for felonies

offlevel: this measure indicates the severity of the most serious charge they are charged with, where 0 is for the least severe and 8 is for the most severe

female: a dummy variable coded 0 for males and 1 for females

black: a dummy variable coded 1 for blacks

otherrac: a dummy variable coded 1 for the "other race" category (Note that when black and other race are in the model together, then the 0 category on each variable refers to whites)

The following questions pertain to the data:

a) What is the equation for this regression model?

b) Write one sentence describing what we have learned about the relationship between the dependent variable and each of the independent variables found to have a statistically significant relationship on the dependent variable. Write a sentence for each relationship. Be specific.

c) What can you conclude about the fit of the model? Explain.

d) What concerns, if any, can you raise about the model, based on the information provided here on the output? Explain.

Regression

Descriptive Statistics

 

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

11.84

2.25

 

3.72

 

.83

.0861

.5976

.2490

3.4211

20.098

1.897

 

2.843

 

1.196

.28051

.49046

.43251

1.25469

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

                                                                            

 

 

 

LOS

 

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS cases

 

Number of prior felonies

Pearson Correlation        LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

1.000

.116

 

.294

 

.266

.035

.061

-.084

.161

.116

1.000

 

.040

 

.030

.010

.035

-.108

.248

.294

.040

 

1.000

 

.665

-.025

.162

-.143

-.024

.266

.030

 

.665

 

1.000

-.023

.131

-.208

.061

Sig. (1-tailed)                    LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

.

.000

 

.000

 

.000

.034

.001

.000

.000

.000

.

 

.018

 

.060

.303

.033

.000

.000

.000

.018

 

.

 

.000

.095

.000

.000

.106

.000

.060

 

.000

 

.

.117

.000

.000

.001

N                                          LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

                                                                                      Correlations

 

 

 

otherrac

 

 

black

 

 

female

 

 

offlevel

Pearson Correlation        LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

.035

.010

 

-.025

 

-.023

1.000

-.374

-.071

-.047

.061

.035

 

.162

 

.131

-.374

1.000

-.027

.072

-.084

-.108

 

-.143

 

-.208

-.071

-.027

1.000

-.174

.161

.248

 

-.024

 

.061

-.047

.072

-.174

1.000

Sig. (1-tailed)                    LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

.034

.303

 

.095

 

.117

.

.000

.000

.008

.001

.033

 

.000

 

.000

.000

.

.079

.000

.000

.000

 

.000

 

.000

.000

.079

.

.000

.000

.000

 

.106

 

.001

.008

.000

.000

.

N                                          LOS

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

2719

 

2719

2719

2719

2719

2719

 

Model Summaryb

 

Model

 

R

 

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.358a

.128

.126

18.794

a. Predictors: (Constant), offlevel, Number of prior JD/JS cases, otherrac, female, Number of filed charges, black, Number of prior felonies

b. Dependent Variable: LOS

ANOVAb

 

Model

Sum of

Squares

 

df

 

Mean Square

 

F

 

Sig.

1                 Regression

Residual

Total

140415.78

957518.90

1097934.7

7

2711

2718

20059.397

353.198

56.794

.000a

a. Predictors: (Constant), offlevel, Number of prior JD/JS cases, otherrac, female, Number of filed charges, black, Number of prior felonies

b. Dependent Variable: LOS

Coefficientsa

 

 

Model

Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

 

 

t

 

 

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1                 (Constant)

Number of filed charges

Number of prior JD/JS

cases

Number of prior felonies otherrac

black female offlevel

-5.976

.714

 

1.575

 

1.808

4.085

.794

.335

2.325

1.343

.197

 

.172

 

.410

1.393

.806

.869

.303

 

.067

 

.223

 

.108

.057

.019

.007

.145

-4.449

3.626

 

9.170

 

4.407

2.933

.986

.385

7.683

.000

.000

 

.000

 

.000

.003

.324

.700

.000

a. Dependent Variable: LOS

Residuals Statisticsa

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

Residual

Std. Predicted Value

Std. Residual

-5.64

-35.960

-2.432

-1.913

47.67

252.596

4.984

13.441

11.84

.000

.000

.000

7.188

18.769

1.000

.999

2719

2719

2719

2719

a. Dependent Variable: LOS

Part-2

Pay equity for men and women has been an ongoing source of conflict for a number of years in North America. Suppose that a statistics practitioner is investigating the factors that affect salary differences between male and female university professors. He believes that the following variables have some impact on a professor's salary:

Number of years since first degree (years)

Highest degree, coded 1 for Ph.D and 0 otherwise (phd)

Average score on teaching evaluations (evaluati)

Number of articles published (articles)

Gender, coded 1 if male and 0 if female (gender)

The following questions pertain to the data:

a) What is the equation for this regression model?

b) Write one sentence describing what we have learned about the relationship between the dependent variable and each of the independent variables found to have a statistically significant relationship on the dependent variable. Write a sentence for each relationship. Be specific.

c) What can you conclude about the fit of the model? Explain.

d) What concerns can you raise about the model, based on the information provided here on the output? Explain.

Regression

Descriptive  Statistics

 

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

salary

44889.790

12906.32702

100

years

23.7000

9.54151

100

phd

.8500

.35887

100

evaluati

5.3496

.54142

100

articles

12.1600

5.92839

100

gender

.6300

.48524

100

                                                                       Correlations

 

salary

years

phd

evaluati

articles

gender

Pearson Correlation

salary

1.000

.941

-.030

.475

.798

.070

 

years

.941

1.000

-.161

.304

.698

.009

 

phd

-.030

-.161

1.000

.176

.187

.142

 

evaluati

.475

.304

.176

1.000

.409

.074

 

articles

.798

.698

.187

.409

1.000

.038

 

gender

.070

.009

.142

.074

.038

1.000

Sig. (1-tailed)

salary

.

.000

.383

.000

.000

.246

 

years

.000

.

.055

.001

.000

.467

 

phd

.383

.055

.

.040

.031

.079

 

evaluati

.000

.001

.040

.

.000

.233

 

articles

.000

.000

.031

.000

.

.352

 

gender

.246

.467

.079

.233

.352

.

N

salary

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

years

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

phd

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

evaluati

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

articles

100

100

100

100

100

100

 

gender

100

100

100

100

100

100

Model Summary

 

Model

 

R

 

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.974a

.948

.945

3014.94701

a. Predictors: (Constant), gender, years, phd, evaluati, articles

b. Dependent Variable: salary

ANOVAb

 

Model

Sum of Squares

 

df

 

Mean Square

 

F

 

Sig.

1

Regression

1.6E+010

5

3127260664

344.037

.000a

 

Residual

8.5E+008

94

9089905.455

 

Total

1.6E+010

99

a. Predictors: (Constant), gender, years, phd, evaluati, articles

b. Dependent Variable: salary

Coefficientsa

 

 

 

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

 

 

 

t

 

 

 

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

-5916.189

3140.847

 

.755

-1.884

.063

 

years

1021.696

48.926

20.883

.000

 

phd

725.748

961.524

.020

.755

.452

 

evaluati

3728.939

619.822

.156

6.016

.000

 

articles

439.148

80.693

.202

5.442

.000

 

gender

1089.720

631.980

.041

1.724

.088

a. Dependent Variable: salary

Residuals  Statisticsa

 

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

21557.234

68157.203

44889.790

12567.51597

100

Residual

-7197.878

7003.2856

.00000

2937.82561

100

Std. Predicted Value

-1.857

1.851

.000

1.000

100

Std. Residual

-2.387

2.323

.000

.974

100

a. Dependent Variable: salary

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Basic Statistics: part -1make sure you read the output carefully
Reference No:- TGS0443462

Now Priced at $30 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)