Mr. Smalley, who had been diagnosed as manic-depressive and had been in and out of mental hospitals, contracted to sell an invention, and then later claimed that the contract was void because he lacked capacity due to his illness. His doctor testified in court that Mr. Smalley was not capable of evaluating business deals when he was in a "manic" state. Using these facts and these facts only, how should the court rule? Is there other information that would be helpful to you in making your decision?