Motion to Compel discovery and production documents (Breif for court):
Paper details:
Subject: persuasive research paper on a (motion to compel for discovery and production of documents (Mainly a Brief for the court)
IMPORTANT: PDF sample Brief for Court and I have already done page “1”and please continue from here open the FILE: motion to compel for discovery documents for the plaintiff.docx
Assignment 1 – Legal Brief (Memorandum of Law) Motion to compel production of documents
Assignment 1 is available on p. 710 of the textbook.
The Motion should be no more than 5 pages long, double-spaced using 12 or 14 point Times New Roman font.
• You do not need a certificate of service page; however, you should have a formal caption on the first page as if you are preparing a formal pleading on a word document.
• Please remember to only include your ID number on the assignment. Pleading paper is preferred, but not required. For all other criteria for this assignment, please refer to p. 710.
• Project: we are not trying to prove who cause the accident BUT just getting the documents into discovery saying that Plaintiff Lindsey Young she was not hurt according to her statement or accusations and compensations
• Discovery, motion to compel, social media
• Social media (find things related to injuries with compensation) (was the facebook settings with privacy setting or without privacy settings)
• Negligence
• Was her (see how the Act committed and car accident)
• 5 WAYS TO PUT THE PROJECT TOGHTER
• What type of LAW? Civil law
• Jurisdiction: Anywhere in the U.S Hint: narrow the jurisdiction to New York
• Authority: 4 cases and 2 statute
• Action: Motion to compel
• Defense: find defenses (restrictions of social media with privacy rights involved)
• Remedies: Want the Social media Documents (compel the production of the documents)
• Facts are coming from P.710
• Lindsey Young is the (Plaintiff) and Michael Carlson who we are (defending) and we need this information of documents for evidence Lindsey wants money from Michael Carlson (Defense)
• This project show be written in a subjective and a persuasive manner and why does she refuse to not give out the documents to the US who is the defense side. We as the defense want the court compel the documents and why we have the right to have them
• Privacy becomes the strategy and Start with Secondary sources
• Introduction
• State of fact statements can be combined in the introduction
For the references or Authority: 4 cases and 2 statute (this will come from WestlawNext.com)
Click on login to WestlawNext
Username:marksilva
Password:Danuka16
For the search engine look up “right to privacy in social media” in the jurisdiction is set for New York (NY) and Federal(Fed.)
Also look up other search engines that will be applicable to the persuasiveness and the subject matter to my “motion to compel discovery” or production of documents
Click on folder and go to Marakkalage’s Research you will see some cases and 1 statue need more cases that are applicable and statue and cite them appropriately to the bluebook citations
HIINT: Romano v. Steelcase Inc. is good case use it this one
Also, under view you will find where you will find statutes pick two that is applicable for the case and the subject matter
Remember we are asking the plaintiff (Lindsey Young) for the production of documents that she has not provided in the first time and the second time with a witness help now we have a cause for admissible evidence from the court’s permission to demand for those documents that is the who purpose of this motion to compel for production of documents and discovery even though she claimed that such would be a violation of her rights to privacy and is a fishing expedition this is where the statues come into place from my knowledge
USE the IRAC format which stands for Issue-Rule-Application-Conclusion, and IRAC boasts a very appealing claim: to provide a step-by-step framework to solving legal problems.
FOR references and citations bluebook 19th edition here are all the detail for all proper citations and the link:
Rule 1.4
Indented Quotations of 50 words or more should be indented and more then have to be 1.5 margins and this blocked quote should be single space and you put the citation after double space (quoting to a part of statue with identifying the court) p.338
Citation Singles are short form citation and signals comes before citation itself No single is (directly quoting and for paraphrasing) Blue book page 54 Rule 1
Please provide correct citations from the bluebook where you have to cite to the case or the statue according to the blue book