Major corporations with overseas subcontractors (such as ikea in Bangladesh, uncle vet in India, and Nike in China) have been criticized often with substantial negative publicity when children as young as 10 have been found working in the subcontractors facilities the standard response is to perform an audit and then enhance control so it does not happen again in one such case a 10 year old was terminated shortly thereafter the family without the 10 year olds contributions to the family income lost its modest home and the 10 year old was left to scrounge in the local dump for scraps of metal was the decision to hire the 10 year old ethical? Was the decision to terminate the 10 year old ethical? Please answer with a reference and source no plagerism