Problem: The line between a peaceful organized and fulfilled society and a society with a state is thin in anarchist thought according to Wolff. He mentions that he will likely come back to anarchist ideas after examining whether or not arguments against a state of nature are refutations of anarchism, so I am interested to read on. He points out that many anarchists have accepted the need for "the authority of experts" within society, as well as social structures that people will depend upon both in war and peace time. The anarchist argument is that individuals are not entrapped by these structures as they are by a state. But if a counter movement grows and social rule is established, according to Wolff it becomes "indistinguishable from a state" provide a critical objection towards this post