Question: Koontz financed the purchase of a car with a loan from Chrysler Credit Corp. When Koontz defaulted in payment, Chrysler sent a collection agency to repossess the car. The agency found the car in Koontz's yard and began to tow it away, despite protests from Koontz. Chrysler resold the car and sued Koontz for the difference between the debt and the sale price. Koontz objected on the grounds that Chrysler had breached the peace in repossessing the car by taking it over his protests. Is Koontz correct? (Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Koontz, 661 N.E.2d 1171)