Discussion Post: Philosophy
Garrett Hardin and peter singer offer dramatically different views on the obligation of nations and individuals to intervene to alleviate world hunger and poverty. While each author offers numerous arguments to bolster their respective points of view, in general, which autho's position to do you find most appealing? Explain why. Is there a middle ground that might be derived from insights provided in each author's position?
The response should include a reference list. Double-space, using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.