Assignment:
Tanaka played soccer at the University of Southern California, a member of the PAC 10 Conference. She became unhappy, asked if she could transfer, and was told that she could. She decided to go to another PAC 10 school, UCLA. USC, unhappy with that choice, invoked an NCAA rule limiting transfers within a conference. The rule required her to sit out one year and to lose one year of eligibility. She sued USC and the NCAA on restraint of trade grounds.
a. Explain her claim.
b. Decide the case. Explain your decision. See Tanaka v. University of Southern California, 252 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2001).