Assignment Task:
Respond to at least two of your peers' initial posts. Make sure that you choose at least one peer's post that describes a program planning model different from yours. Include the following in your response:
Compare and contrast at least one strength and one weakness of your chosen planning model against your peer's chosen model, and then explain which model you believe is more effective and why.
Identify at least one other similarity or difference (not already discussed in your peer's initial post) between their chosen model and the logic model. Discuss whether this similarity or difference would make the logic model more or less preferable over your peer's chosen model and why. Want Assignment Help?
Melissa Discussion:
Multiple program planning models have been developed to help direct building program foundations. These models are important in providing a systematic step by step path to ensure that planners evaluate all necessary variables of the identified problems. Like any other model, each has its strengths and weaknesses that make them different from the others. The two models I chose to compare here are the logic model and intervention mapping model.
The logic model of program planning develops a visual aid that can be formed to address the specific considerations for the plan (Payton et al., 2022). After identifying a problem and its population, a table is made to include columns where specific questions and answers can be displayed in one place. The columns address what resources need to be introduced into the plan, what outputs of the plan should reach the target population, then ultimate outcomes after implementation of the model. Additional columns identify outcomes that are divided to address the timeline of short, medium, and long term effects. Payton et al., (2022) revisited and modified this logic model as needed throughout the entire program process, including the long term outcomes phase.
The intervention mapping model has six steps that incorporate the use of a couple of logic models. Batzler et al., (2024) states the first step of intervention mapping involves gathering planners, performing a needs assessment, and defining the target population and behaviors to which a logic model of the problem is formed. In the second step of intervention mapping, the team determines what behaviors should be modified to obtain the determined goals of the program. This step builds a logic model of the expected changes. Intervention mapping step three introduces proven change models to implement. Step four refines the plan. Step five implements the plan by the persons most well suited to do so. Step six evaluates the plan and its outcomes.
In comparison of the different strengths of these two plans, one strength of the logic model is the dedicated visual tool that has all the important data in one table to show how the steps are interrelated. Another strength in the logic model divides outcome evaluation into short term, medium term and long term considerations to help ensure the program succeeds. These topics I do not see clearly addressed in the intervention mapping model. The strengths I see in intervention mapping is the in-depth steps which include making a logic model for the problem and a logic model for the changes. Additionally, the specifics of this model ask for consideration for both behavioral and environmental factors in each step (Batzler et al., 2024). A third strength that intervention mapping uniquely provides is the specific call for the use of "theory and evidenced based methods for behavior change" (Batzler et al., 2024, para 17).
References:
Batzler, Y.N., Schallenburger, M., Schwartz, J., Marazia, C., & Neukirchen, M. (2024). Destigmatizing palliative care among young adults-A theoretical intervention mapping approach. Healthcare, 12(18).
Payton, C., Kumar, G. S., Kimball, S., Clarke, S. K., AlMasri, I., & Karaki, F. M. (2022). A logic model framework for planning an international refugee health research, evaluation, and ethics committee. Health Promotion Practice, 23(5), 852-860.
Shanice Hendricks
Good day everyone,
To make people healthier and happier, healthcare program planning brings about social change and shows people how to make that change happen (Issel, Wells, & Williams, 2022). Planned programs allow healthcare providers to better understand community needs and inequalities (King, & Hartson, 2020). It identifies the areas that require modification and acts as a roadmap for putting the suggested program into action. Additionally, it guarantees that stakeholders comprehend the procedure and is helpful for assessing the program's performance (King & Hartson, 2020).
One method for effectively carrying out the planning process is intervention mapping (IM). Program planning is aided by intervention mapping, which draws on both theory and information (Fernandez, Ruiter, Markham, & Kok, 2019). Three viewpoints are used by IM to assist in directing the process at every stage. "Participatory plan, eclectic use of theory, and an ecological and systems approach" are the methods that IM use when planning its programs (Fernandez, Ruiter, Markham, & Kok, 2019). The IM process identifies the need that has to be met, outlines the necessary changes, and explains how those changes can be made. It also outlines the anticipated results and provides an evaluation of the plan's design. In the same way, a logic model figures out what needs to be done and what tools are needed to make the plan happen (How to develop, 2022). Program planning makes use of inputs, outputs, and outcomes. The program's inputs are the materials it will require to run, its outputs are the steps it will require to reach its objective, and what it achieves are the results it is anticipated to produce (How to create 2022). The six actions that must be done are one of the intervention mapping model's weaknesses. In the early stages of planning, this may appear overwhelming and overly confusing for staff members. The logic model is good because it is easy to understand. It only has three steps, so you can focus on the program itself.
Reference:
- Fernandez, M. E., Ruiter, R. A. C., Markham, C. M., & Kok, G. (2019). Intervention Mapping: Theory- and Evidence-Based Health Promotion Program Planning: Perspective and Examples.Frontiers in public health,7, 209.
- How to develop a logic model. The Compass for SBC. (2022, July 27).
- Issel, L. M., Wells, R., & Williams, M. (2022).Health Program Planning and Evaluation: A practical, systematic approach for Community Health. Jones & Bartlett Learning.