Question 1: How might the principles of classical criminology influence the Supreme Court's recent decision regarding juvenile life sentences without parole? Consider how the classical approach, which emphasizes punishment fitting the crime, may align with or diverge from the court's recent stance on juvenile sentencing.
Question 2: In what ways could positivist criminology's focus on biological and psychological factors influence the treatment of juvenile offenders in the context of this recent Supreme Court ruling? Consider how the positivist perspective might impact considerations of rehabilitation and the inherent potential for change in juvenile offenders, specifically.
Question 3: Opinion: How does this recent Supreme Court ruling illustrate the impact of evolving interpretations of constitutional protections for juveniles? How does it illustrate the importance of understanding theories of criminology?
Review: "Supreme Court Rejects Restrictions On Life Without Parole For Juveniles"