1. In their commentaries on the McLean v. Arkansas court case, Michael Ruse and Larry Laudan agree that creation science does not belong in the school science curriculum. However, they offer different reasons for this conclusion. Briefly explain the reasons that each of them offers?
2. In the materials we have reviewed for the two court cases, we have seen the statement "Evolution is both a fact and a theory". Explain what the statement means, and provide an example illustrating the facticity of evolution.