In Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc., et al., Cipollone sued based on state consumer protection laws. What did cigarette makers argue?
- Federal laws regulating promotion and advertising activities regarding tobacco products should be considered supplemental to state laws.
- The court should consider state laws only.
- The claims were preempted by federal laws regulating cigarettes and tobacco products.
- Federal and state laws conflicted, negating both, so the court had no basis to make its decision.