Assignment task:
Ronald W. Rosenberger, a University of Virginia student, asked the University for 5800 from a student activities fund to help pay for the cost of Wide Awake: A Christian Perspective at the University of Virginia. The university refused to give funding for the publications solely because it promoted religious beliefs. Rosenberger sued the University of Virginia. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Rosenberger.
A) Identify the constitutional clause that is common to both Rosenberger v. University of Virginia and Engel v. Vitale
B) Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of Engel v. Vitale led to a different holding than the holding in Rosenberger v. University of Virginia
C) Describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in Rosenberger v. University of Virginia could take to limit its impact