Identify arguments as deductive or inductive arguments


Problem: Identify the following arguments as deductive or inductive arguments. Then, if deductive, identify as either valid or invalid. If valid, then identify the specific deductive argument form. If invalid, give a counterexample showing where assuming the premises are true the conclusion is false. Then, if deductive, identify as either sound or unsound. If inductive, then identify as either strong or weak. If strong, identify the specific inductive argument form. If weak, explain why the inferential is not consistent with the Principle of the Uniformity of Nature. Then, if inductive, identify as either cogent or uncogent. b) "Since the Department of Defense Building outside [Washington D.C.] has the shape of a hexagon, it follows that it has seven sides." b) "When Neil Armstrong landed on the moon, he left behind a gold-plated Schwinn bicycle, which he used to ride around on the moon's surface. Probably that bicycle is still up there on the moon." c) "The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor happened in either 1941 or 1951. But it didn't happen in 1941. Therefore, it happened in 1951."

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Identify arguments as deductive or inductive arguments
Reference No:- TGS03364913

Expected delivery within 24 Hours