Part I: Compose an 500 words argument that one might make in relation to your field of study, but which is purposefully flawed. Employ at least four logical fallacies in the argument. For example, the argument can be related to how the public perceives your field, how a newcomer to the field may make an error, or addressing a controversial topic in your field.
Part II: In the next 1500 words, you will take on the role of a leader in your profession. In the scenario for Part II, you have been asked to address the errors with the person who submitted the argument from Part I. You will not want to be harsh with the person who made the mistakes, but will use leadership knowledge, skills, and abilities to help make corrections. Use your critical thinking and analytical skills to evaluate the arguments, explain how they should be corrected, and offer guidance for improved argumentation in the future.
Analyze the argument from Part I. Identify and label the logical fallacies being used in the argument. Be specific.
Using clear argumentation, explain the implications of those fallacies in the workplace, and why the fallacies would be problematic. Why do you believe the person making the argument used these tactics?
Offer guidance: How could the person constructing this argument avoid making those mistakes in argumentation? What would have strengthened each of the claims?
Please choose something in the healthcare field or closely related for the part 1. I need content to make up around 1000 words