Managerial Social Responsibility Assignment: Live Case Analysis
Length 2500 words.
The ‘Cricket Ball Tampering'Case
In 2018, the Australian Men's Cricket team was involved in a ball tampering scandal during their test series in South Africa.Your task is to research the facts underpinning the ‘Cricket Ball Tampering' Case, and to provide a written report* detailing your ethical analysis of case.
Your report must include a discussion of the following:
1. Case Facts
Describe the facts that underpinned the ethical dilemma in the case
2. Decision Maker
Who was the decision-maker in the case, and what conflicting demands did they have to accommodate?
2. Ethical Dilemma
What was the initial ethical dilemma faced by the decision-maker in this case?
4. Case Analysis
Using the Utilitarian, Kantian, Rights, and Distributive JusticeApproaches to ethical decision-making, provide an analysis of the ethical dilemma.
5. Final Recommendation
Present and justify the final recommendation you would have made to the decision-maker in this case had they asked you for advice on how to resolve their initial ethical dilemma.
NOTE: You are not required to define any of the ethical theories in your report. You are required, however, to fully reference the case facts you use in your report.
Guide Line
A Guide to completing the Major Assignment logically and within the word limit:
The following guide should be used when planning your answer to the assignment case:
Question 1: 600 words approximately - be sure to include only that information that is directly relevant to the ethical dilemma. The inclusion of information that is not relevant to the ethical dilemma, no matter how interesting, will not attract marks. No introduction, contents page or executive summary is required.
Question 2: 150 words approximately - be sure to identify the decision-maker that has the initial ethical dilemma in the case, and to detail the competing pressures you believe they faced at the time of their decision.
Question 3: 100 words approximately - be sure to accurately define and justify the ethical dilemma. Make sure it is expressed as two exactly opposite alternatives, and explain how each alternative is undesirable for the decision-maker specifically (i.e. how do you expect they will face punishment for their decisions?)
Question 4: 1400 words approximately - to answer this question well, you need to introduce each of the four theories in turn (i.e. each theory should have its own section). Ideally, you will apply the steps of each theory to the case as you identify and define them. As a guide you should allocate approximately 500 words to Utilitarianism, 400 words to Kantianism, 250 words to Rights, and 250 words to Justice.
Question 5: 250 words approximately - identify and justify the final recommendation would you have made given the opportunity to consult with the decision-maker before they made their decision. You must explain how the decision-maker could avoid the punishment(s) that you identified in Question 3
Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
1. The answer should be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
2. The response also includes a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
3. Also include a reference page. The Citations and references should follow APA format. The reference page is not included in the required page length.