Problem 1: Identify a specific theory of cognitive or moral development, and summarize the major assumptions.
Problem 2: Analyze the extent to which the theory is consistent with a social perspective by providing three specific examples in the theory's assumptions. You might want to consider some of the following questions to critically evaluate the theory. (Note: You do not need to address every question below in your post. Rather, use these questions to inform the examples you provide.)
Problem 3: How did the socio-historical context influence the development of the theory?
Problem 4: Are there constructs that reflect a deficit approach?
Problem 5: To what extent do the constructs promote growth and change?
Problem 6: Are there assumptions that end up blaming the victim?
Problem 7: Are there assumptions that pathologize certain groups individuals, families, or communities?
Problem 8: To what extent does the theory promote self-determination and autonomy of individuals, families, and communities?
Problem 9: To what extent does the theory foster a collaborative working relationship with individuals, families, and communities?
Problem 10: Using one of the required media, explain how the faculty person applies theory in the research discussed.
References:
Kotcherlakota, S., Zimmerman, L., & Berger, A. M. (2013). Developing scholarly thinking using mind maps in graduate nursing education. Nurse Educator, 38(6), 252-255. doi:10.1097/01.NNE.0000435264.15495.51
Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter?Links to an external site.Higher Education, 62(3), 279-301.
Walden University Academic Skills Center. (2020). ASC success strategies: Critical thinking skills[Multimedia].