Problem
Given all the temptations and trouble that teenagers can get into these days Sara Smith decides to covertly monitor the activities of her two children. She installs "spy-buddy" on their computers, GPS tracking on their cell phones, monitors what they eat at school, and installs hidden surveillance cameras in their bedrooms. She does not feel bad about any of this...parents are supposed to look after their kids...right?
i. Do kids have privacy rights? Why/Why not? Does age matter?
ii. How would Mill view this case? How would Kant view this case? Would this sort of monitoring be morally justified according to Mill or Kant? Why/Why not? Be prepared to present your answers.