Response to the following:
On what facts did the court base its decision that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a partnership under the TRPA?
Why do you think Dr. Ingram acted in this way? Do you agree with the court's decision based on the language of the TRPA?
Be specific and elaborate-do not just say yes or no. Why or why not? What do you think Dr. Deere should have done before entering into this arrangement with Dr. Ingram?