How to convince the court to come to an opposite conclusion


Assignment task:

At Issue:

Whether the Department of Homeland Security's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy is judicially reviewable, and whether DHS's decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful.

Finding:

The Department of Homeland Security's decision to wind down DACA is reviewable, and its decision is in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).

After reading the complete case, do you agree or disagree with the Court's ruling? Why? 

What argument(s) would you have used to convince the Court to come to an opposite conclusion? Provide rationale and support from course readings for your answer.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: How to convince the court to come to an opposite conclusion
Reference No:- TGS03377570

Expected delivery within 24 Hours