Problem: Write a reply to: I've taken into consideration how there are a lot of sources this week and on week one as well. In my experience the more information there is the better being you can never be to educated. However there is a downside when all the information is stating the same thing exact thing also to many different links containing the information whether it be the same or different also is not ideal. In the perfect world all the information that's essential and on a need to know basis are archived in a central location with different sectors or "chapters" in respect to what each individual link is trying to convey to the ascertaining reader. There are a plethora of resources regarding critical infrastructure because there are most likely conflicting ideas and suggestions in regard to how to approach infrastructure, how secure the infrastructure, how to deal with threats, etcetera. This leads back the previous downside of to much information and can lead to disaster of its own similar to that of unsolicited donations during a crisis where it actually prevents life saving operations rather than aids it because it is literally a hindrance. To combat this issue there needs to be an agreed upon centralized plan as to how to address certain scenarios with the possibility of accreditation going to individual companies sanctioned and upheld by a centralized authority preferably the Department of Homeland Security. After this is established once again there needs to be an arch