How principle of justice applied in clinical decision-making


Assignment task:

Writing/Essay Assignments Content

Autonomy: Obtain the wishes of the patient so that their autonomy can be protected.

Beneficence: To seek to act in the patient's best interest.

Justice: Navigate due process to determine where the limits on healthcare lie.

Non-maleficence: Designate harm and determine how to avoid it.

1) How is the principle of justice, both in ethics and law, applied in clinical decision-making?

2) How do the Harm principle and the Best Interest principle differ?

3) The patient bill of rights specifies that the patient is entitled to the services of an interpreter if requested. How have you seen this operationalized in your institution? What are the risks?

Please note the grading rubric. This assignment is to be submitted as an essay- with an introduction, questions developed at the graduate level, and a conclusion to summarize and synthesize key points. APA must be strictly followed. The submission should be minimally 4 pages not counting the cover page and references.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: How principle of justice applied in clinical decision-making
Reference No:- TGS03430664

Expected delivery within 24 Hours