How mass mobilization be central to regime stability


Assignment Task:

1. Voting for Autocracy Beatriz Magaloni Cambridge University Press 2006 chapter4 "The Politics of Vote Buying"

2. Kitschelt, Herbert. 2007. "Party Systems," in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 522-554.

3. Hagopian, Frances. 2007. "Parties and Voters in Emerging Democracies," in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 582-603. Stokes, Susan C. 2007.

4, "Political Clientelism," in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 604-627.

 5. Boix, Carles. 2007. "The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems," in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 499-521.

Instructions: Look for the articles above and answer the questions below.

Mass mobilization (and de-mobilization) can be central to regime stability. Democracies and authoritarian regimes have different ways of achieving their aims on this front. Vote buying, the topic of Magaloni's chapter, nicely problematizes this for regimes in transition. The rest of the readings highlight the challenges of mass politics in democratic regimes and why some become stuck in low-quality governance traps. Based on this description, write a reaction paper by connecting all the 5 articles, again how does each of the articles critique each other. Write your thought about it too.

I need a well detailed answer, NO SHORT ANSWERS

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: How mass mobilization be central to regime stability
Reference No:- TGS03442255

Expected delivery within 24 Hours