Problem 1: What specific physical features of Kennewick Man's skeleton led Owsley and Chatters to believe that Kennewick Man was not actually a descendent of local Native American tribes? How do we know (now) that they were probably wrong?
Problem 2: Do you believe that the United States 9th circuit court decided the Kennewick Man case properly when they ruled in 2004 that scientists should be allowed to study his remains before the local Native American tribes could rebury him? Justify and explain the answer.
Problem 3: The question of identifying a person's "race" is obviously still a large issue here in the United States and around the world. One problem with this issue is that people don't agree on what the word "race" actually means. Is it the way we look? Is it where our ancestors lived? Is it a certain pattern of DNA sequences? Most people judge a person's "race" or ancestry instantly from their physical appearance (mostly from skin tone and a few facial features). Based on the information provided in this article, are obvious physical features the best way to determine a person's ancestry? Explain words and support the answer with at least one quote from the article.