Problem
What is Leopold's "non-anthropocentric" ethics and the authors' modified non-anthropocentric ethics (on p. 178)? Which do you find more palatable? Why?
Referring to the Jonas reading address the following questions: How has (i) the recent vulnerability of nature, (ii) the new role of knowledge in morality, and (iii) the growing sense of nature as a "human trust" changed or expanded the features that need to be accounted for by an adequate modern ethics?