How ernest nagel would confront any of the claims made


Problem

What is the difference and similarities between Thomas Aquinas argument of causation and argument of contingency? Explain briefly how Ernest Nagel would confront any of the claims made by Thomas Aquinas in defense of the existence of God (as you understand his criticisms of the first cause argument). Or explain how any other atheistic thinker either from the course materials or from your own finding would react to Aquinas' theistic claims.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: How ernest nagel would confront any of the claims made
Reference No:- TGS03246922

Expected delivery within 24 Hours