1. If Home Depot was correct in that it was not discriminating, but simply filling positions consistent with those who applied for them ( and very few women were applying for customer service positions), given your reading of this chapter, was the firm guilty of discrimination? If so, under what theory?
2. How does this case illustrate the application of new technology to solving issues that have never been tied to technology? Can you think of other ways technology might be used to address diversity/ EEO/ affirmative action issues?