This illustrates why the tap gain corresponding to the sum of a large number of potential independent paths is not necessarily well approximated by a Gaussian distribution. Assume there are N possible paths and each appears independently with probability 2/N. To make the situation as simple as possible, suppose that if path n appears, its contribution to a given random tap gain, say G00, is equiprobably ±1, with independence between paths. That is,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c34ff/c34ff8a4a4ea27ce3744a0172bfb0628bfd43f73" alt="622_95a81c67-ff79-4db1-9dff-70ffdeb386c2.png"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df36/9df364c8aa2ac524c2a6fe065bd057c409c0623c" alt="873_b6872691-cad2-4c0b-ba8b-015d4e673b72.png"
(b) Give a common sense explanation of why the limiting rv is not Gaussian. Explain why the central limit theorem does not apply here.
(c) Give a qualitative explanation of what the limiting distribution of G00 looks like. If this sort of thing amuses you, it is not hard to find the exact distribution.