Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Luther King, Jr. are representatives of 2 major models of ultimate reality: materialism and transcendence. Traditionally, materialist philosophers like Nietzsche claim that in materialism there is no such thing as right and wrong in an absolute sense. On the other hand, philosophers from the 3rd model, transcendence, claim that in transcendence there is absolute right and wrong. Why do you think they would link no absolute standard of right and wrong with materialism but an absolute standard of right and wrong with the third? Apply the second part of the ontological argument to this discussion.
(Please do not say that they link no absolute standard with the first model because the first model does not believe in an absolute standard of right and wrong, or that they link the absolute standard to the third model because it believes in the existence of that standard. That would be a circular argument, begging the question.)