Problem
A. Heart of Atlanta Motel v US Can you make an argument that application of the CRA to the motel was not correct? What is it about the motel that allowed it to fall under the commerce clause? Explain your impressions of the use of federal law in this way.
B. Do you believe there is a practical difference between Mccreary County, Kentucky v American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky 2005 and VanOrden v Perry, Governor of Texas 2005? Why or why not? Explain.