Explain why something are wrong no matter who approves of it


Discussion Post

One major implication of ethical subjectivism and cultural relativism is that the individual or culture, respectively, is morally infallible. That is, so long as an individual or culture approves of something, then it would be morally correct. Do you think either of these views (subjectivism or relative) is true? If not, explain why somethings are wrong no matter who approves of it. If so, you need to explain why you think that something like genocide is morally correct so long as an individual or culture approves of it.

The response must include a reference list. Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font, double-space, one-inch margins, and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: Explain why something are wrong no matter who approves of it
Reference No:- TGS03187512

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)