Problem: Remembering back to the Week 2 memo, Mr. Smith did attend the carnival, abided by the "free speech" area rules and all went well. Now..he is, at this moment, appearing before the City Council and using his 3 minutes of public comment time to explain what he means by "corrupt and wasteful spending." He's holding up two pieces of paper claiming that one is a paid invoice from the City to ACME Paving (fictional) for $100,000, signed off by the Finance Director. The second piece of paper is allegedly an email between the Finance Director (on his personal email account) and the owner of ACME Paving (on his personal email account), that is titled "Thank God for Potholes." The two men are apparently in-laws, each married to sisters. The email, apparently, details how ACME's paving contract will allow the two families to take that long awaited vacation to Las Vegas. As the city manager, you remember the ACME contract. It was a contract for $75,000 for pothole and road repair across the City, which you signed, as is the practice, with a $25,000 cost overrun provision (for materials, time, labor costs above the original contract amount), allowable with city manager