Question: Explain two of the first four of Thomas Aquinas' arguments or "ways" in defense of God's existence. Then show what these two arguments (the ones you chose to explain) have in common and how they differ, if at all. Explain how would Ernest Nagel confront any of the claims made by Thomas Aquinas in defense of the existence of God (as you understand his criticisms of the first cause argument). Or explain how any other atheistic thinker either from the course materials or from your own finding would react to Aquinas' theistic claims. Please take the time to elaborate.