Assignment:
Several years ago, John Pearson registered the domain name partytime.com with Span Systems, a domain name registrar. The domain name was registered to the name of Pearson's business, E-advertisements. Later, Curt Fredrickson sent Span Systems a copy of a letter that he claimed to have received from E-advertisements. The letter stated that E-advertisements did not have an objection to Fredrickson using the domain name partytime.com and that the letter granted permission to Span Systems to transfer partytime.com to Fredrickson. Without contacting Pearson, Span Systems transferred the name to Fredrickson, who subsequently turned partytime.com into a lucrative business. Pearson filed a suit against Fredrickson and others, seeking the domain name and Fredrickson's profits. The court ordered Fredrickson to return the domain name to Pearson and pay $55 million in damages. Fredrickson ignored the court's order and disappeared.
Are there any other parties Pearson could attempt to obtain relief from?
Under which theory of intentional torts against property might Pearson be able to file an action (explain what the theory is and apply it to the facts)? What is the likely result, and why?
2 to 3 paragraphs