In reference to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn
Explain the difference(s) between Herschel and Whewell’s accounts of verae causae
Is an anomaly, according to Kuhn, sufficient to cause a crisis in normal science?
What do theoretical innovations and anomalous novelties of fact have in common, according to Kuhn?
What are the effects of a crisis on the work being done within a normal science tradition?
What does Kuhn mean when he claims that from another point of view, "every problem that normal science sees as a puzzle... can be seen as a counter-instance and thus as a source of crisis?"