1. Explain Kant’s critical response to Hume in the section of the Critique of Practical Reason entitled “On the Warrant of Pure Reason in its Practical Use to an Extension which is not Possible to it in its Speculative Use” (pp. 44-50 of the Cambridge edition). In your view, should Hume have been persuaded by Kant’s arguments? Why or why not?
2. How does Kant seek to reconcile freedom with natural necessity in the section of the Critique of Practical Reason entitled “Critical Elucidation of the Analytic of Pure Practical Reason” (pp. 75-89 of the Cambridge edition). How does Kant’s approach differ from Hume’s? Which account do you find more convincing? Why?
3. Explain Fichte’s critical response to Kant in the Second Introduction to the Wissenschaftslehre (pp. 36-103 of the Hackett edition). In your view, should Kant have been persuaded by Fichte’s arguments? Why or why not?